Home

Daniel's Study



Bible Study Outlines

Bible History and Versions

Articles and Notes

Children's Plays

Online Resources


You are Here: BibleSanity.org >> Bible History and Versions >> The Textus Receptus


The Textus Receptus

Novum Instrumentum Omne

by Daniel Stanfield


The "Textus Receptus"

For the KJV New Testament, the Novum Instrumentum Omne (the "Received Text") by Erasmus was used.

Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam (1466-1536) was a Catholic theologian who used Greek manuscripts available in Basel, Switzerland to publish a revision of Jerome's Latin Vulgate (A.D. 405), which was the current Bible in use at that time. What was originally intended as a revision to the Vulgate became a very useful and popular printed source of the Greek New Testament.

Erasmus provided his Latin side-by-side with the Greek in printed form in 1516 as "Novum Instrumentum Omne," which translates to, "the Complete New Testament." From the publisher's preface came the phrase "Textum ergo habes, nunc ab omnibus receptum," meaning, "You have the text, now received by all," from which we get the vernacular names, "Textus Receptus" and "the Received Text."

The Novum Instrumentum Omne was revised in 1519, 1522, 1527, and 1535. It is the first edition which Martin Luther used for his German Bible. The publication of Tyndale's English Bible (KJV precursor) was in 1526-1534 and includes the Comma Johanneum of the 3rd edition which Luther excluded.

The Source Manuscripts of the TR

There were 8 manuscripts used for the first edition, all of which had originally come from Constantinople (in 1453). GA stands for Gregory-Aland and is a manuscript identification number.

Dating

Contents

GA #

10th-11th C.

Pauline Epistles

2817

12th C.

Four Gospels, Acts, Epistles

1

12th C.

Four Gospels

2

12th C.

Pauline Epistles

2105

12th C.

Apocalypse (Revelation)

2814

12th C.

Acts, Epistles

2815

15th C.

For Gospels

817

15th C.

Acts, Epistles

2816

The Comma Johanneum

The third edition of Novum Instrumentum Omne was infamously supplemented by a contemporary (1520) manuscript, Codex Montfortianus (GA #61), which was only used for the extended text of 1 John 5:7-8, which was not in any of his existing manuscripts, and which Erasmus himself rejected as non-authentic in his "Annotationes."

Note: A primary source for this article was https://textandcanon.org/erasmus-and-the-search-for-the-original-text-of-the-new-testament, by Martin Heide, retrieved 3/06/2025. Other unrecorded sources were also used (mostly from my own library), but Heide's article was extremely helpful.



(C) Copyright 2025 Daniels Stanfield. This document may be distributed freely, but may not be sold or modified.