See more...See more... |
You are Here: BibleSanity.org >> Bible Versions >> Info and Review - English Standard Version English Standard Version (ESV)Information and ReviewThe English Standard Version (ESV)The ESV (2001) is a Crossway publication which is "essentially literal," seems to be of the hightest quality. According to Crossway, 2025, most copies are given away through ministry parters, with over 2.5 million copies have been sold and 1,255 million copies have been printed and distributed from 2015-2025. Text Used This is a Critical Text translation using Kittel's Biblia Hebraica for the Old Testament, and Eberhard Nestle's Novum Testamentum Graece for the New Testament, with the special Gideon's edition utilizing some TR readings (see below). Gender-Accurate The ESV Bible uses the original gender in many places and is otherwise gender-accurate, with compliance to the Colorado Springs Guidelines tested to be 100% (17 rules or rule parts, 30 test verses). My gender-translation checks are based on the 2025 edition. Inclusion/Exclusion of MT Passages The three main texts which are supported by Majority Texts, but ommited by some Critical Text Bibles are John 5:4 (pool of Bethesda), which the ESV omits but includes in a footnote, John 7:53-8:11 (woman taken in adultery), which the ESV includes in brackets, and the end of Mark, which the ESV includes in brackets.
Publications and Variants It was first published in 2001, used the Revised Standard Version (1971) as initital text, and has utilized the NET Bible translation notes. It has been revised in 2007, 20011, 2016, and 2025.
Literacy before Literal? ESV.org describes it's version as an "essentially literal translation of the Bible in contemporary English," and "emphasizes 'word-for-word' accuracy, literary excellence, and depth of meaning," and is also published at an 8th grade reading level. This sounds too good to be true - without my own exerience with the Bible, I would come away doubtful, but it is really done quite well, though it is slightly less literal than some translations. My Personal Experience with the ESV For a handful of years or so, my pastor and another elder both used the ESV, and so I became familiar with how their versions read compared to my NASB 1995 ed, and I have to say that I have found it slightly too interpretive for my taste. Sadly, I don't remember any particulars to use for examples, but I remember doing a few resultant Greek word checks and coming away satisfied. My own copy is the 2011 version, but I just never got comfortable enough with it to use it for services or daily readings. When I purchased the Bible I did several particular checks for test passages and found no suprises or anything noteworthy. I am very comfortable with the ESV as a very good literal version to recommend, it's just not my choice for my own personal use. (C) Copyright 2024 Daniel Stanfield, this document may be distributed freely, but may not be sold or modified. |